Learning Is like . . . like . . .
by Julie Tollefson
Wire coat hangers and skeletons have a lot in common.
A wire coat hanger can bend
and return to its original shape. So can a skeleton.
The hanger's triangle
gives shape to the coat that hangs on it. The bones of a skeleton give
shape to the body around it.
And both last a long time.
You could say that a skeleton
is like a wire coat hanger because both provide shape for something
else and both are flexible and strong.
But why would you want to?
Because if you were a struggling
student trying to understand the human skeleton, learning to use an
analogy to understand it might make the difference between passing and
failing an anatomy test, say University of Kansas researchers.
Analogies -- stories or descriptions
that tell how two or more things are alike -- can help students grasp
and remember new, complex concepts, the researchers say, leading to
better scores on tests and better grades in courses.
Janis Bulgren and her colleagues
at the University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning have developed
a tool to help teachers and students build these analogies in order
to "anchor" new information to knowledge students already have.
The tool is called the Concept
Anchoring Table. It's a visual template that allows teachers and students
to note, in graphic form, the connections between new and old information.
A corresponding set of written-out
steps -- the Concept Anchoring Routine -- is another learning aid developed
by the researchers, says Bulgren, a senior research scientist.
It guides teachers and students
as they name the old and new concepts, explore characteristics of each,
identify shared characteristics, and develop an explanation of how the
two concepts are alike -- as in the skeleton example -- or define the
new concept using the characteristics they have identified.
With each step, Bulgren says,
the teacher prompts students to take an active role in understanding
both the material and the learning process itself.
This approach to learning
departs markedly from the teaching style that still dominates in many
classrooms. The traditional instructional model of a teacher lecturing
to students, who in turn memorize notes and lists to prepare for tests,
is simply not effective for many students.
"What is effective is explicit
instruction and learning partnerships of the kind created when teachers
and students use the Concept Anchoring Table and the Concept Anchoring
Routine," Bulgren says.
Her research results back
her up.
When teachers in a KU-CRL
study used analogies -- in the form of the Concept Anchoring Table and
Routine -- their students performed much better on tests than students
who were taught using more traditional methods.
"The use of the routine was
associated not only with many more students earning passing scores on
the tests, but also with more students earning average and above-average
grades," Bulgren said.
Improved classroom performance
is critical if students are to feel good about themselves and their
learning, Bulgren said.
Although KU-CRL's overriding
goal is to help students with learning disabilities or who are low achievers,
this study showed improvements by all groups of students. "This is important,"
Bulgren said, "because teachers of academically diverse classes are
expected, more and more, to arrange instruction so that all students
can successfully reach certain standards."
Bulgren said that teachers
are more likely to adopt a new practice if the majority of their students
-- at every level of capability -- see value in what the teacher is
doing. Another plus for the Concept Anchoring Table and Routine is that
teachers don't change course content, Bulgren said.
An article about the use of analogy
as a teaching tool in diverse classroom was published in 2000 by the
Journal of Educational Psychology. The authors are Bulgren; Don
Deshler, director of the Center for Research on Learning; associate
director Jean Schumaker; and senior research scientist Keith Lenz.
Julie Tollefson is director of communications at
the KU Center for Research on Learning.
